And then, no one talked about it.

September 17, 2011 3 Comments

On August 7, we had a mad power struggle for whose name would be listed first on the masthead. Randolph’s? It was his idea to start a magazine in the first place. Carissa’s? It was her idea for the magazine to be a literary journal.

After three rousing matches of fisticuffs with no clear victor, we changed the editor listings from “Randolph Pfaff (Editor), Carissa Halston (Editor)” to “Carissa-Halston-Randolph-Pfaff (Editor-Monster).”

Since then, we’ve gotten cover letters addressed to Carissa. We’ve gotten cover letters addressed to Randolph. We’ve gotten a few cover letters that were addressed to Carissa-Halston-Randolph-Pfaff, which Carissa chalked up to people thinking that there was an individual on staff whose name is Carissa-Halston-Randolph-Pfaff, as Randolph could be a surname or a forename.

But in regards to the Editor-Monster title, no one has said a word.

We think we’ll leave it that way for a while.

Reminder: Submissions for Volume Two, Issue Two are open for twelve more days. Will you address the Monster?

News

3 Comments → “And then, no one talked about it.”

  1. Quilty 5 months ago   Reply

    I still prefer “Halspfaff.”

    • apt 5 months ago   Reply

      We usually go with Pfalston. It was that or Halfaff, which (to my ear) sounds Shakespearean. Either way, maybe we should switch it up sometimes.

  2. Julia 4 months ago   Reply

    I’m totally into the Monster. Sorry — Editor-Monster.

Leave a Reply